Monday, July 8, 2013

CREATIVE TRANSFORMATION

The metaphor of journey is often used to depict the way our perspective shifts and evolves over time. We speak of how we “move” from one point of view to another. In Galatians 1:11-24 Paul gives an accounting of his own spiritual journey. In this somewhat disjointed passage, Paul gives an accounting of his own spiritual evolution.

As we said in our last post on Galatians, the situation Paul is addressing in this letter is that some unnamed “teachers” have come among the Galatians lobbying for them to first embrace circumcision and other strict Jewish observances in order to be “true” followers of Christ. This is a perspective which Paul had embraced in his earlier years, but when he had encountered the message of Jesus—a message of radical inclusion—he grew to embrace a new perspective which sought to include rather than exclude.

If we reflect on the thousands of years of human history, we can see a long trajectory of bloodshed over the issue of peoples and nations trying to assert their strongly-held religious perspectives and beliefs onto others. This is what Paul had done: “You have heard, no doubt, of my earlier life in Judaism. I was violently persecuting the church of God and was trying to destroy it” (Gal. 1:13). The word translated “Judaism” (Gk., Ioudaismos, extremely rare in this period), signals that Paul was formerly engaged in a particularly devout and passionate form of loyalty to Jewish tradition.[1]

Paul was a great religious rule-keeper—and he knew it. He’d spent years seeking to live according to the Jewish customs and traditions, but it hadn’t made him right with God. When it comes to being a good Jew and observing Jewish laws and practices, Paul is saying: I’ve already been there and done that! You can’t make yourself acceptable to God by the most zealous and detailed following of any moral, ethical, or cultural rules. Paul’s story is a powerful witness to the beating heart of Christianity—the good news of God’s grace. We might also call it the good news of creative transformation.

Grace is the free, unmerited favor of God, working powerfully on the mind and heart to creatively transform us. There is no clearer example than Paul that salvation is by grace alone, not through moral and religious performance. Though Paul’s sins were very deep, he was invited in.

No one is so good that they don’t need God’s creative transformation, nor so bad that they can’t receive it. Paul needed transformation. Paul was deeply flawed, yet he could be transformed by the gospel—and he was!

As Paul looks back, he can recognize that God’s transformation was working in his life long before his actual change of mind and heart. When Paul says God “set me apart before I was born and called me through his grace” (v 15), he means that God had been shaping and preparing him all his life for the things God was going to call him to do.

How astonishing! Paul was fashioning God out of his own imagination and doing it all wrong, but God was using Paul's experiences and even Paul's failures to fashion Paul into God’s instrument for building Christ-communities.

As Tom Ehrich writes:

We know the God whom we fashion of our own limitations. But the God of infinite love and mercy remains a stranger—until we, too, need that God. In that moment—when we feel small and defeated, worthless and unloved—we discover a God who is our best friend, our steadfast companion, our lover. And more and more. 

Human language runs out. Even our parallels and metaphors fail to grasp the one who alone can restore our lives … and make us more than we ever imagined being.

If we know that God is always tantalizing each of us toward the most creative ways of “living, moving, and having our being” in the world, we can trust that God’s attraction is authentic for others in ways that differ from our own. The good news gives us a pair of eyeglasses through which we can review our own lives and the lives of those who differ from us and see God preparing and shaping us all to become networks of God's grace and transformation in the world.

This is where Paul lands. He isn’t like those Christians who, many years ago, wore buttons or displayed bumper stickers that announced, “I found it!”---as if they could reduce the mystery of divine creativity to the “it” they found! But even more troublesome, the slogan ignored the God who comes looking for lost humankind in Jesus Christ. The line from the popular hymn “Amazing Grace” is instructive: “I once was lost, but now am found.” Grace finds us. 

Paul isn’t saying, “Look at me, aren’t I great?” but, “Look at how great the gospel is: it is the power of God to transform life!”[2] Paul affirmed the Galatians as being people who were found by the love of God as non-Jews; they needn’t be forced into becoming something that they are not in order to be considered to be “for real” in their faith journey.

The truth is that the real God loves us simply because God loves us. The real God effortlessly transforms us from what we were into all we can be simply because it pleases God. All we need to do is let God fashion us into people who know that…

To love means loving the unlovable [like us].
To forgive means pardoning the unpardonable [like us].
Faith means believing the unbelievable.
Hope means hoping when everything seems hopeless.

This is creative transformation. This is God’s “amazing grace.”

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Sleeping Through Storms

God is not all-powerful—at least, not in the ways we define power.

For most of us, power means that we get our way. Power means that we can impose our will upon the world around us. Power means we can conform others into our images in order to achieve unity and security. In our minds, we equate power with control.

So, when the world spins out of control as it did in Oklahoma, and at the Boston marathon, and at Sandy Hook Elementary School something over six months ago, we begin to wonder what happened to this all-powerful God to whom the skies and seas and nations are supposed to bow.

Are the heavens really declaring the majesty of God when a tornado destroys an entire town? 

Only the most deranged and pathological of leaders suggested in tragedy and disaster’s wake that God was in control of the situation or was somehow, ultimately, responsible for such occurrences. I’m sorry, but I don't believe that shootings, terrorist acts and tornadoes are part of God’s plan! 

Most of us can admit that without losing our faith, just like we can admit that God isn’t really calling the shots (no pun intended) when it comes to bullets, bombs, jet streams, weather patterns and 200-mile-per-hour winds. What we imply in this, but don’t often say, is that, deep down, we know God is not in control. Secretly, we give thanks for that. 

Naturally, we then ask where exactly God is in the midst of tragedy and suffering. This question doubles as an unconscious prayer of thanksgiving and relief. While we may feel desolation and alienation from God in the midst of great tragedies and natural disasters, we also feel grateful—hopeful, even—that God isn’t orchestrating all the pain and destruction in the world. It’s a relief not to be worshipping a God who sends tornadoes, earthquakes, tsunamis, disease, and plague. It’s a relief not to pray to a God who indiscriminately kills children with the same heavens which declare God’s glory.

God is not in control of the weather. I don't believe God is in the business of controlling anything.

But if God isn’t in control in the midst of such destruction, then who or what is? Something more sinister? Maybe something more dangerous than a sinister being? Perhaps no one—and nothing—is in control. It’s a scary and disorienting thought to begin to consider God isn’t protecting us like the divine Secret Service from the suffering and tragedy in our world.

We find this idea jarring because I think we misunderstand what divine power is. God doesn’t control the weather, because that isn’t the nature of God’s power. God’s power is something more mysterious, more paradoxical.

God’s power is in the giving up of power, in the act of disarming divine omnipotence in favor of covenant and relationship with creation.

God’s power is in the act of becoming empty (Gk. kenosis) in order to become one of us. As Paul writes in Philippians 2:5-8:
Christ Jesus … who, though he was in the form of God,
did not regard equality with God
as something to be exploited,
but emptied himself,
taking the form of a slave,
being born in human likeness.
And being found in human form,
he humbled himself
and became obedient to the point of death—
even death on a cross.

God’s power is in being in us and with us, not as all-powerful and “up there” somewhere.

In the gospel of John, Jesus tells us that when we see him, we see God. There’s a popular saying based on that notion, suggesting that the radical nature of the Christian faith is not that Jesus is like God, but that God is like Jesus. And Jesus is in the business of emptying himself of power to the point of utter alienation and forsakenness by God. So what if God is indeed like Jesus?

But, you might argue, there’s a story in the gospels about Jesus and his power to control the weather, and it’s true—there is such a legend. Once upon a time, as the writer of Mark tells us, a terrible storm rises on the sea, threatening to swamp the disciples and the boat they are in. They are terrified, undone at the prospect of capsizing and drowning. They are baling water from the boat, struggling with wind-whipped sails, hanging on for their lives.

Jesus, meanwhile, is sleeping.

“Don’t you care that we are perishing?” the disciples finally shout at him to wake him.

Jesus rebukes the wind and commands it to quiet down. As the text says, “He woke up and rebuked the wind, and said to the sea, ‘Peace! Be still!’ Then the wind ceased, and there was a dead calm (Mk 4:39).

Jesus is rebuking the disciples as much as the storm when he says, “Peace! Be still!” Then they marvel at his power, asking, “Who then is this, that even the wind and the sea obey him?” (Mk 4:41). 

We are like the disciples. We want God to calm the wind and seas. We want to shout, "God, what’s the matter with you? Don’t you see we are perishing? Don’t you see so many of us — children, even! — have already perished? Wake up, God! Stop sleeping when we need you most!”

Like the disciples, we believe the power—the divine—is in the ability to control things. We assume, like the disciples, that the miracle is in Jesus rebuking and calming the storm.

But if you notice, Jesus doesn’t seem to want to do anything. He wants to keep sleeping! He goes so far as to rebuke his disciples for even asking for his help. He calls them faithless. This storm-calming power is the kind of power Jesus came in order to give up, to empty himself of. It’s the same power he rejects when he refuses to throw himself from the pinnacle when he is tempted in the desert. It’s the same power he turns down when he refuses to kneel before the Adversary. It’s that same superficial power that controls earthly things.

I don’t really think the miracle in this story is about Jesus calming the storm and taking control. The miracle in this story is that Jesus is there, with the disciples in the water-logged and weather-beaten boat, experiencing the same terrible storm, the same terrible waves, and the same terrible danger, and that alone should have been enough.

God’s power isn’t in the control of creation or of people, but in being in covenant and relationship with them. It isn’t in imposing the divine will or insisting on its own way but in sojourning with us as we fumble around and make our way in the world. God’s power is not in miraculous interventions, pre-emptive strikes in the cosmic war against suffering and evil, but in inviting us to build with God a commonwealth of love, peace and justice. God’s power is not in the obliterating of what is bad in the world, but in empowering us to build something good in this world. As Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa has said, “Do your little bit of good where you are; it's those little bits of good put together that overwhelm the world.”

Instead of enforcing control and solutions onto the world, God’s power is revealed in coming alongside us, journeying with us, suffering with us, and even staying with us in the boat when the storms come.

Friday, June 21, 2013

THE GOSPEL FROM A TO Z

Paul’s letter to the Galatians is dynamite! It’s an explosion of joy and freedom that leaves us enjoying a deep significance, security and satisfaction—the life of blessing into which God calls us. Galatians brings us face to face with the gospel—the real, genuine gospel. 

It’s very common in Christian circles to assume that “the gospel” is a set of basic "ABC" teachings that are the way in which someone enters the kingdom of God. But in this short letter, Paul outlines the bombshell truth that the gospel is the A to Z of the Christian life. It’s not only the way to enter the kingdom (the “A”); it’s the way to live as part of the kingdom (“B” through “Z”). The gospel changes life from top to bottom. The gospel transforms our hearts. The gospel transforms our thinking. The gospel transforms our approach to absolutely everything.

Paul challenges us with the truth that those who’ve been followers of Jesus for quite a while need the gospel every bit as much as new followers. Paul will explain to us that the gospel—the message that we are more wicked than we ever dared believe, but more loved and accepted in Christ than we ever dared hope—creates a radical new dynamic for personal growth, for obedience, for love. As I've said, the gospel is dynamite, and I pray that it explodes in your heart, and makes you passionate to see it do the same work in others’ hearts.

 It’s helpful to recognize three things from the historical setting of Paul’s letter to the Galatians which will help us understand it: 

First, the Apostle Paul’s task was starting new Christ-communities. After he began one of these communities and then left that region, he continued to supervise these communities through letters. Galatians is customarily dated around 54 C.E. It’s the only one of Paul’s seven genuine letters to be addressed to a group of communities rather than to a single community or individual; it is sent to the “churches of Galatia.” 

Those in the Christ-communities in Galatia were primarily non-Jews, nearly all of them “God-lovers” who had been attracted to Judaism and now were attracted to Paul's message. In other words, their background made Paul’s converts in Galatia vulnerable to being misled.

Bear in mind, first of all, that Paul’s converts in Galatia weren’t being tempted by non-Christian teachers. Rather, these teachers were followers of Jesus! This was a major issue within early Christianity. The first followers of Jesus in Jerusalem were Jewish, but as the gospel spread out from that center, increasing numbers of non-Jews began to receive Christ. After Paul left Galatia, other teachers had told the Galatians that non-Jewish men had to be circumcised and both women and men had to follow Jewish food laws. For them, it seemed obvious that what Jesus began was a movement within Judaism and that non-Jews needed to become Jews. That included circumcision. They also taught that non-Jews needed to observe kosher dietary laws in order to be completely pleasing to God. These teachers meant well. I think they were only adding what they considered to be important customs and practices to somehow enhance the gospel. You might say they were offering a “new and improved” version of the gospel.

 By insisting on Christ-plus-something-else, i.e. Christ plus observance of the Jewish law as a requirement for full acceptance by God, these teachers were presenting a whole different way of relating to God from the one Paul had given them. Although this controversy might seem pretty irrelevant to us today, some of us also practice a Christ-plus-something-else gospel. For some of us, it might be Christ-plus-living better, trying harder, or making more of ourselves—whatever our own pet God-project or concern might be. But for Paul, this Christ-plus-something-else gospel simply would not do!

Paul addressed it with an all-abiding, all-important, always-relevant truth. He taught that the cultural divisions and disunity in the Galatian Christ-communities were due to confusion about the nature of the gospel. It is this different gospel that was creating the cultural division and strife. Paul forcefully and unapologetically fought the “different gospel” because to lose one’s grip of the true gospel is to desert Christ himself (1:6). Therefore, Paul believed everything was at stake in this debate. 

Perhaps the most striking aspect of the opening of Galatians is Paul’s tone, and the frame of mind that lies behind it. Paul is surprised and he also seems angry. Paul shows his most unattractive side. His language is remarkably strong. He sounds like he has a chip on his shoulder. Where normally Paul’s letters move on, after his greeting, to a thanksgiving for those he’s writing to, here he simply says: “I am astonished …” (verse 6a). What has made Paul so angry?

 First, Paul is angry because these followers of Jesus are taking hold of a gospel that isn’t really a gospel (v 7), so they are in enormous danger. They are in “confusion” (v 7b). 

Second, Paul is enraged at those who are misleading the converts of the Christ-community—those who are “trying to pervert the gospel” (v. 7b). Paul calls down condemnation on them (v. 9). More indirectly, Paul is also angry at the Galatians themselves, warning them that they are deserting the God who called them (v. 6b)--a serious charge! 

We’ll see as we walk through portions of Paul’s letter that what caused his angry outburst was a group of teachers who were teaching new non-Jewish followers of Jesus that they were obliged to keep the Jewish cultural customs of the law—the dietary laws, circumcision and the rest of the ceremonial law—in order to be truly pleasing to God. To the Galatians, this didn’t appear to be a radical difference from what they’d been taught. Surely the whole point of being a follower of Jesus is to be pleasing to God! But Paul says: “This is an absolute repudiation of everything I’ve been telling you.”

Paul isn’t pulling any punches! But if we put ourselves in Paul’s shoes and believe what he believed about the gospel, then we will find his attitude justifiable. If the Galatians are really turning their backs on God and taking hold of a gospel that isn’t a gospel at all, then their condition is dangerous.

But who is Paul to write to these people in this way? He’s an “apostle”—a person who has been sent with immediate divine authority. The Greek word apostolos means “sent one” and refers to someone commissioned for a particular task. Paul’s phrase “not of human origin” drives home the uniqueness of Paul and the first apostles. Of course those who are called to ministry by the Holy Spirit today are not “of human origin” either—the ultimate cause of their ministry is Jesus’ call, and the ultimate authority for their ministry is the witness to Christ in Scripture. But they are appointed by human authority. This means that though ministers ultimately receive their call from God, they are called through the intermediaries of other human ministers, by the approval of a denomination, through the election of a congregation, etc.

 Paul is claiming a whole lot more than this. He says in vv. 11-12:
“For I want you to know, brothers and sisters, that the gospel that was proclaimed by me is not of human origin; for I did not receive it from a human source, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ.”
Paul is saying here that he didn’t receive his apostolic commission through anyone human source at all. No apostles taught him. No church commissioned him. He was commissioned and taught directly by the risen Jesus himself. 

Second, in verses 8-9, Paul says he was sent with a particular divine message—the gospel—and he gets more dogmatic about it than most modern congregations would put up with from any preacher, regardless of how important or eloquent she might be. Paul writes:
… even if we or an angel from heaven should proclaim to you a gospel contrary to what we proclaimed to you, let that one be accursed! As we have said before, so now I repeat, if anyone proclaims to you a gospel contrary to what you received, let that one be accursed! 
Wow! This means Paul claims his teaching is the standard for judging who is right and who is wrong. What Paul says is not the result of study, research, reflection and wisdom. It is God-given and both unchanging and unchangeable.

 This dogmatic and divinely-appointed Apostle reminds the Galatian Christ-communities of his message—the gospel, the only gospel. Then he gives them a quick, yet comprehensive, outline of the gospel message:

Who we are: helpless and lost! That’s what the word “rescue” implies in verse 4. Other founders of religions came to teach, not to rescue. Jesus was a great teacher, but when Paul gives us this nutshell version of Jesus’ ministry, he makes no mention of that at all. The average person on the street believes that a “Christian” is someone who follows Christ’s teaching and example. But Paul implies that’s impossible. After all, you don’t rescue people unless they are in a lost state and a helpless condition! This is what theologians call “total depravity” or, more accurately, “spiritual inability”. 

What Jesus did: How did Jesus rescue us? Jesus “gave himself for our sins” (v 4a). By adding “for our sins” Paul indicates clearly that he was thinking in sacrificial terms. In an age when sacrifice was almost universal as a means of retaining the goodwill and blessing of the gods such overtones would not have been missed. The word “for” means “on behalf of” or “in place of.” Christ’s death was represented as not just a general sacrifice, but a substitutionary one. He didn’t merely buy us a “second chance”, giving us another opportunity to get life right and stay right with God. He did all we needed to do, but cannot do. Symbolically, Jesus did all we should have done, in our place, so when he becomes our Savior, we are absolutely free from penalty or condemnation. 

What God did: God accepted the work of Christ on our behalf by raising him “from the dead” (v. 1) and by giving us the “grace and peace” (v. 3) that Jesus Christ won and achieved for us.

Why God did it: because God wanted to. This was all done “according to the will of our God and Father” (v 4d). God graciously planned what we didn’t realize we needed, and Christ by his grace (v. 6) came to achieve what we could never have achieved ourselves. There is no indication of any other motivation or cause for Christ’s mission except the will of God. There is nothing in us which merits it. Salvation is sheer grace alone. 

If we contributed to our rescue … if we had rescued ourselves … or if God had seen something deserving of rescue, or useful for God’s plan, in us … or even if we had simply called out for rescue based on our own reasoning and understanding … then we could pat ourselves on the back for the part we played in saving ourselves.

 But the gospel—Paul’s gospel—is clear; salvation, from first to last, is God’s doing. It is God’s calling, God’s plan, God’s action, and God’s work. This is the truth that lies at the heart of our faith. Paul reminds us that in the gospel we are brought far lower and raised much higher than we can imagine. I like what Jerry Bridges has said:
“Your worst days are never so bad that you are beyond the reach of God’s grace. And your best days are never so good that you are beyond the need of God’s grace.”

Friday, June 7, 2013

REVELATIONS ON REVELATION, PART 6

In my last post on Revelation, we started breaking the code in which John is writing. We learned that whenever he speaks of the “dragon,” that’s code for Satan, the devil. When he writes about the “beast” that’s code for the Roman Empire. In Revelation 13:11-18 he mentions another beast. Who or what is this second beast?

As we’ve said before, the emperors—many of them, anyway—required everyone to bow down to an image of the emperor and say, “Caesar is Lord!” The emperor needed thousands of religious officials to support and enforce this worship, acting with the power and approval of the emperor. They are represented by this second beast. This unholy priesthood is very good at its job. They were able through trickery to even make these images of the emperor appear to speak, even to breathe out smoke and fire as a way of creating fear and encouraging persons to bow and worship him, or else receive the consequences.

Worship of the emperor—bowing before his image and saying, “Caesar is Lord”—was a required pledge of loyalty to the emperor and the empire. Anyone who would not do this was suspected of treason. If the Romans took anything seriously, it was any threat of rebellion. Recall the trial of Jesus. Pilate could have cared less about all the religious charges being made against Jesus, but when Jesus was charged with being opposed to Caesar, Pilate took swift action.


If the threat of death didn’t force everyone to worship the emperor, the Romans could play another card—an economic one. That’s what the “mark of the beast” is all about. Verses 16-17:
… [the beast] causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell who does not have the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. 
The Greek word used here for “mark” is charagma, the term for the imperial seal on official documents. You could only receive this seal by worshipping the emperor. In effect, it was a business license. Without it, you couldn’t buy or sell anything. Something else was behind this “mark of the beast.” What was used throughout the Roman Empire on a daily basis that had the image, name and blasphemous titles of the emperor? Coins, of course.

 John is saying to his fellow Christians, “These Romans want to boycott us in order to force us to worship their gods. We will boycott them! Don’t do business in any way, shape or form with Rome! Don’t even carry a coin with the hideous mark or image of the beast on it. To do otherwise is to support an evil empire that is oppressing and killing your fellow brothers and sisters. To use this filthy money, to bow down so we can get a license to sell and buy is to receive the mark of the beast! It’s as if the mark or image of the beast isn’t on the coins or the documents but on our very foreheads and hands! We must not do this! For we have another mark, the mark of Christ on our foreheads—the mark of baptism. We belong to Christ, not the emperor. I know this is difficult and costly. But it is far better to suffer now than to renounce our faith in Christ and suffer far greater later.”

Remember the whole issue of apartheid in South Africa? Do you recall how a small white minority were calling all the shots there, and leaving people of other races impoverished? During that time, it was brought to the attention of Church leaders in many main-line denominations that pension funds were being invested in companies and corporations in South Africa benefitting from apartheid. A decision was made to divest from any such companies, for to do otherwise was to support that oppressing regime. In a sense, this is what John is saying to Christians of his era.

Next, John turns back to the beast himself, to the emperor. Lest there be any confusion, he’s going to identify the beast:
This calls for wisdom: let anyone with understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a person. Its number is six hundred sixty-six (Rev.13:18).

There’s probably nothing in Revelation that’s the source of more speculation that than the identity of “Mr. 666.” He’s been identified with popes, presidents, and leaders throughout the centuries. But what was John really saying here?

Note that John says that understanding this requires “wisdom” or understanding. In other words, he admits to writing in code and that this can only be understood by knowing how to break it.

John is practicing “gematria,” a kind of numerology. Greek, Hebrew and Latin didn’t have numbers like the English language does. We have an alphabet and a number system—1-2-3, etc. Those who spoke Greek, Hebrew, and Latin used their alphabet to double for numbers. (Think of Roman numerals.) It would be like us saying that A stands for 1, B for 2, C for 3, etc. You could send someone a message using a combination of letters, if you knew the numerical value of each letter.

John is saying that the beast is the person who name comes out numerically as “666.” Six is the number of evil. Said three times, “666” means that this beast is the very embodiment of evil! The name that scholars have found that matches the numbers “666” in Greek, Latin or Hebrew is “Neron Caesar”—Nero!

Remember the beast that had a mortal wound but somehow survived or had even been resurrected. As we’ve said before, this was thought by many to be Nero, but I think John was saying this: “Every emperor who comes to power and persecutes God’s people is Nero brought to life again. Every ruler who does the unholy, cruel and unjust things Nero did—including Domitian, the present emperor—is Nero alive again! He is the epitome of evil. He is 666! And though he would pretend to be a god, he will get what he deserves sooner or later. He will be judged by the true God!”

The important thing in Revelation is a warning—live by the oppression and persecution of others and you’ll reap what you sow. Nero has been alive throughout history and he is alive and well all over our world today! But history shows us that every nation or ruler who has built on the crushed bodies of persons sooner or later crumbles.

The United States of America had best take heed. God has given the United States great wealth, power and influence. How are we using them? Does it concern you—as it does me—that one American corporation (I won’t say which one) made $39 billion from the violence of the Iraq war? Does it concern you—as it does me—when you learn that income growth for the bottom 90% of Americans averaged just $59 /year over the past four decades, while income growth for the top 10% averaged $116,071 /year? Does it concern you—as it does me—when you hear that one wealthy member of the U.S. House of Representatives (again, I won’t say who) raked in $3.5 million in federal farm subsidies and called himself a “successful businessman” and then, at the same time, voted to cut food aid for the poor and called food stamps stealing “other people’s money”? I fear we are long past the need for some serious soul-searching as a nation—of who we are, why we are and what we are doing. We aren’t so high and mighty that we can’t fail and fall.  

The heart of Revelation has to do with the challenge that faces every generation of Christians, whatever their historical setting and circumstances, to be who we say we are—true followers of Jesus Christ. Maybe we aren’t forced to bow down to some emperor and say he’s a god, but there are pressures on us to compromise, to get along, to be like everyone else.

Paul wrote these words to the Christians living in Rome:
I appeal to you therefore, brothers and sisters, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God—what is good and acceptable and perfect (Romans 12:1-2).
J. B. Phillips’ translates this: “Don’t let the world around you squeeze you into its mold.”

The message of Revelation can be summed up this way: don’t allow the culture to call the shots! Don’t allow it to determine your values and priorities. You belong to Jesus Christ. Live as citizens of the Commonwealth of God!

When self-centered materialism shapes and molds our values, remember who you are! You are more than your credit cards. You are more than money. The brand you wear is not just Abercrombie and Fitch. No, you’re branded as disciples of Jesus Christ. 

If you want to find the “mark of the beast,” look for the pressures in everyday life which would undermine the values of mercy and love, compassion and caring, generosity and hospitality—those things which are meant to be the identifying marks of the followers of Jesus Christ.



"…AND I'LL BLOW YOUR HOUSE IN…"

Who hasn't heard the story of the “Three Little Pigs”? It begins with the title characters being sent out into the world by their mother, to "seek their fortune". The first little pig builds a house of straw, but a wolf blows it down and the pig runs away. The second little pig builds a house of sticks, which the wolf also blows down after he lets his brother in and before the pigs run away. The third pig builds a house of bricks and lets his brothers in. The wolf fails to blow down the house. He then attempts to trick the pigs out of the house by asking the pigs to meet him at various places, but the pigs outwit the wolf each time. Finally, the wolf decides to come down the chimney, but the clever little pigs catch the wolf in a cauldron of boiling water. The pigs slam the lid on, and cook and eat the wolf.

My favorite part of the story was the repeated verse:

"Little pig, little pig, let me come in."
"No, not by the hair on my chinny chin chin."
[then I’d say along]
"Then I'll huff, and I'll puff, and I'll blowwww your house in!”

The early followers of Jesus had built houses of grief and mourning. Their leader had been executed by the Romans. But then a new message came and blew their houses down: “Jesus is alive!” Over the course of 40 days Jesus continued to teach and to touch. But the time came for Jesus to leave. He went to be with God, but left instructions for God’s disciples to wait in Jerusalem until the gift of the Holy Spirit was given.

Pentecost was a Jewish feast, celebrated 50 days after Passover. It was one of 3 pilgrim festivals—that is, when all Jews were required to travel to Jerusalem with sacrifices and offerings.

The Bible says that those of us who follow Jesus are on a journey. Jesus, too, was and is on a journey to find us.

Here is the central truth of Pentecost. We don’t “come to God”; God comes to us.

The dominant impression the world has of the church is that it’s for good people who have stopped doing the things they call sin. Church is for people who have guilty consciences and need help with them. So they come to God for help. But that’s not what makes the church what it is. No, the church is about God coming to us.

Chris Glaser has written in his blog:

“Jesus loves me, this I know,” and not just because the Bible tells me so. Mere words could never convey the love I have felt from Jesus. It came from my mom and dad, from Christian friends, teachers, professors, clergy, guides, soul friends, and lovers. And it came from the Holy Spirit, opening scripture to me, opening my heart and mind, and releasing me from the whitewashed tombs of doctrines that no longer resonate.


If it were up to us to “come to God,” our faith would be a matter of earning things. Being good enough would matter. Being smart enough would matter. Getting our act together would matter. God would only be for the spiritual ones, the healthy ones, the good ones. You’d have to know something or have something or be something in order for you to come to God.

So the Christian tradition says that God made the first move. The Christian tradition tells us God gave the Son, so that we would realize that we are already forgiven of our misguided attempts to follow God. Then God gave the Spirit at Pentecost, so that we would have the power and the courage and the strength to begin and continue our journey.

When we draw near to God, it’s because God drew near first. When we reach out to God, it’s because God reached out first. When we love God, it’s only because God loved us first. The Holy Spirit, God’s continuing presence in us and among us, is proof that we don’t come to God without God’s first coming to us.

We need to understand that we’re harder to find than God is. We hide from God. We hide behind our image of having it all together. We hide behind criticism and condemnation, because we won’t forgive ourselves. We hide behind masks because we think God would be displeased if God really knew our thoughts. No, you don’t look for God. God’s not lost. You are.

Might I suggest that you simply let God love you. Rejoice in the fact that because of Pentecost, we have God’s Spirit living inside us, the same Spirit that raised Jesus from the dead—resurrection power at our fingertips. Let’s let ourselves be found by God, but watch out! God will huff, and puff, and blow your house in”! Then God will help you build a whole new one.

Monday, May 13, 2013

9 Out Of 10 Americans Are Completely Wrong About This Mind-Blowing Fact


Revelations on Revelation: Part 5

In my last blog post we saw how John wrote the Book of Revelation in a kind of code, which sought to reveal and conceal. He revealed a message of faith and endurance to his persecuted readers. But he concealed this message from the Romans, as he had very harsh things to say about them and his belief of their ultimate fate. So, our task is to try to break that code. 

Revelation chapter 13 has so many well-known images in it: a dragon, beasts, the mark of the beast, and the number 666. These have been subjected to the most speculative interpretations, often with outlandish results that would even have John scratching his head.  Because we’ve taken the time to better understand this style of writing and the setting in which John lived, we can feel pretty confident that we understand much of what he was trying to say.

In chapter 12, John uses the image of the great “dragon.” That’s code for evil or the Devil. We know this because John identifies the dragon as the Devil in verse 9 of chapter 12. At the end of that chapter, the dragon is standing on the seashore.

Beginning in chapter 13:1 John sees “a beast” or monster rising out of the sea. The implication is that the dragon, the Devil, standing on the seashore, calls into creation something evil, a beast, through whom to work.

If you stand on Patmos, where John was, and looked west over the Mediterranean Sea, what country would you see rising out of the ocean? Right—Italy or more specifically, Rome! John later even makes this more explicit in chapter 17:12 when he says the place of which he writes rests on “seven mountains…” What great city was built on seven hills or mountains? Right again—Rome.

John uses various images to speak of Rome. Sometimes he refers to it as “Babylon,” that wicked ancient city that treated the Jews so harshly in the past. He does this in chapter 17. But also there he refers to Rome as a woman. Rome or Roma was actually a goddess who had temples and statutes devoted to her. In other words, Rome itself was worshipped. But John is saying in chapter 17 that Rome is no goddess! Rome is a whore, drunk, not with wine, but with the blood of the saints!

Back to chapter 13… John speaks of Rome as a “beast,’ a monster. Much of the imagery John uses here has been used before. For example, these references to beasts and their descriptions come right out of Daniel 7. But John takes and uses those images in new ways for his own circumstances. In Daniel we read about a beast with four heads. Daniel was talking about four kingdoms or empires—Babylon, Media, Persia and Greek. John says that the beast of which he is referring has the following:

And the beast that I saw was like a leopard, its feet were like a bear’s, and its mouth was like a lion’s mouth (v. 2).

John is saying that the beast he is talking about is worse than all the four other kingdoms put together! It leaps on its prey like a leopard, crushing it like the feet of a bear, roars and tears it apart like a lion! John is referring to the awesome power of the Roman Empire. This mighty, seemingly glorious empire of Rome is a bloody beast, oppressing and destroying any who would oppose it or refuse to bow before it.

John describes this beast, Rome, as “having ten horns and seven heads; and on its horns were ten diadems, and on its heads were blasphemous names” (Revelation13:1b). A horn was a symbol of power or authority. John is speaking in code of the emperors of Rome. Since the time of Augustus, there had been seven “heads” or emperors:  Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Vespasian, Titus and Domitian. Those are the seven who actually became true emperors for an extensive period of time.

You will note that John mentions 10 horns. Nero died in A.D. 68. For about eighteen months, Rome was in chaos as three individuals sought the throne in this order—Galba, Otho, and Vitellius, but they only ruled for a very short time. That’s a total of 10!

What of the ten diadems on these horns? A diadem is a crown-like headband the emperors were known to have worn. Rome divided its empire into ten provinces, enforcing their power by appointing governors, over each one, e.g., Pontus Pilate for Palestine. Many scholars think this code of ten diadems is referring to these ten lesser rulers who were but shiny headbands on the emperors.

What about this description of the beast in verse 1:  “and on its heads were blasphemous names”? Just as Rome itself was made a goddess who was worshipped, the emperors also were thought of as gods, and worshipped as such. Some of them—like Caligula, who was truly insane—enforced it. He had the heads of all the statutes of the gods cut off and his own likeness replacing them. He went so far as to seek to set up such a statue in the Holy of Holies in the temple in Jerusalem and had an army ready to enforce that he be worshipped there. He was assassinated before that plan could be put into action.

The point here is that on statues and on coins titles were given to the emperors such as these:  divine, son of God, lord, and savior.  Nero, for example, called himself “the savior of the world.” For Christians and Jews, this was blasphemy. 

John sees the emperors as the very embodiment on earth of the Devil himself, carrying out his evil schemes. Note that in the last part of verse 3 John says this very thing:  “And the dragon gave it [the beast] his power and his throne and great authority.” For John the source of Rome’s power was satanic.

But there was one emperor who for John and his reader’s was the worst of all. His name was Nero, who ruled from A.D. 54 to 68. He was very possibly mad and most certainly drunk with power. He had persons executed on a whim. In A.D. 64 a significant fire broke out in Rome. Many thought Nero was behind this in order to make room for a new palace complex. In order to point the finger elsewhere, Nero blamed Christians for the fire. After all, rumor had it that they were teaching and preaching that the world would end in fire and likely were acting to help make that a reality. Nero had Christians in Rome crucified, some dressed in filthy rags and fed to dogs, while others were put on stakes, coated in tar and set on fire in Nero’s garden while he rode among them on his chariot. Tradition also says that the two greatest leaders in the early church, Peter and Paul, were martyred under Nero. We see why John and his fellow Christians would hate and fear Nero.

But they had another reason to hate and fear him. Near the end of his reign, Nero’s army in Gaul and Spain rebelled against him. Soon the Roman Senate and his own guards did the same. Nero saw the handwriting on the wall and either committed suicide or had a servant do it by having his throat cut.

You would think this would be a fit end to Nero, and that John or no one else would have to be concerned about him. But, in fact, Christians and many Romans themselves still worried about Nero. Why? Because there was a lot of mystery surrounding his death. There was a rumor for a long time that Nero hadn’t died—that he had fled to the east and was rebuilding his army and would march again on Rome and continue his persecution of Christians. Other rumors were that Nero had died but come back to life. Many took these rumors seriously.

Now what does this have to do with Revelation? Listen to Revelation 13:3 again:  “One of its heads seemed to have received a death-blow, but its mortal wound had been healed.” Recall that these “heads” represent the emperors. Here John says one of them had received a mortal wound but was thought to have died and come back to life. The thought of Nero alive and ruling again was the worst possible nightmare for Christians. John seems to be taking these rumors quite seriously. Or, more likely John even thought that the present ruler, Domitian, was actually Nero. For all practical purposes, Nero did come alive again when a new emperor continued his oppressive policies!

Verse 4 reads:  “They worshipped the dragon, for he had given his authority to the beast, and they worshipped the beast, saying, ‘Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?’” It seemed the whole world was worshipping the beast, as Rome, so powerful, was imposing its rule on everyone, especially in the worship of the city itself, Roma, and of the emperor as a god. Indeed, in light of such power, who could stand? What was a Christian to do?

John gives words of hope and comfort in verses 5-10. First, he reminds them that their names are written in the “book of life of the Lamb.” Rulers in those days kept a registry of all the citizens in their kingdom. If your name was in the book, you enjoyed all the rights and privileges of being a citizen. John is saying that the true King of kings has a book of life with the names of the citizens of God’s kingdom written in it. As citizens they would enjoy all the rights of citizens, one especially was that of eternal life.

Second, note the part of verse 10 that speaks about those who take up the sword.  “If anyone slays by the sword, with the sword must he be slain.” This is most likely a reference to similar words of Jesus when Peter takes up a sword to protect Jesus when he’s being arrested in the Garden. I think in Revelation John is calling for rebellion against Rome, just not a physical or armed one, but a spiritual one, one of faith. You see, there were various responses to Rome’s rule. Some, like the Zealots among the Jews, sought to raise an army and overthrow the Romans. This reached such a point that Rome finally marched against Jerusalem in the Roman-Jewish War from A.D. 66-70, when Jerusalem and the temple were destroyed. This is an example of what happens to those who try to live by the sword. John advocates a different way to respond to Roman oppression, not with violence, which was the way of Rome itself and Rome was far better at it.

Note verse 10:  “Here is a call for the endurance and faith of the saints.” John says it even more plainly in 14:12: “Here is a call for the endurance of the saints, those who keep the commandments of God and hold fast to the faith of Jesus.” These two verses are the heart of John’s message. The response of Christians under such terrible oppression is one of endurance, of faith, of trust in God’s ultimate power to save and redeem them.

Jesus himself is the great example for them. He, too, suffered under the rule of Rome. He was tortured and crucified, yet remained faithful and true to God.  But that was Good Friday. The Romans controlled that day. But they could do nothing about Sunday—Easter! So, John’s readers, too, must endure, with the hope and faith that they, too, go through the agony of Good Friday to the glorious victory of Easter Sunday!

 Sometimes everyone seems to have a wild beast at their heels. Circumstances arise, forces come against us so overwhelming that we have little if any control over them. The beast could take the form of sickness or financial burdens or, depending on where one lives, even persecution under another blood thirsty Nero. I have seen such beasts arise many times. And we can fight against them or seek to flee, but some beasts, some circumstances, catch up with us anyway and would seemingly triumph over us.

But I have also often seen something else—brave people who somehow found something deep inside them that led them to stop running from or cowering to the beast and turning to face it instead with courage and faith, and in so doing overcoming it.

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Revelations on Revelation: Part 4

When Jimmy Carter was president, back in the late 1970’s, something happened that plagued the later part of his first and only term. Do you  remember what that was? Right—the Iranian Hostage Crisis. Our embassy there was taken over and 66 of our people were held hostage; 52 of them were held for 444 days! They were eventually released on January 20, 1981, just a few minutes after a new president, Ronald Reagan, was inaugurated.

What you might not know is that among the hostages was a certain Marine sergeant who happened to be Latino. He had been stationed there to help protect the embassy. Things were not looking very good at all for them. They lived under the constant threat of being executed. So, on the prison wall of their cell he wrote this in Spanish: “Viva la America!”

Does anyone know what that means? Yes—“Long live America!” Why do you think he wrote that? Yes—to bolster the spirits of his fellow captives. He was trying to tell them to hang in there. Things did look back but they could not give up or give in. They were American citizens! They had to keep the faith that they would not ultimately be abandoned by their country. They just had to be patient, to endure, to keep the faith.

This Marine sergeant spoke English. Why did he write his message in Spanish? I think it was because he knew his fellow hostages would understand what he wrote but that it wasn’t likely their captors would. They didn’t speak Spanish. He used that language to communicate a hidden message of hope and encouragement to his fellow prisoners. In other words, you might say he used a code. 

In 2002, a movie came out entitled, “Windtalkers.” It was based on real persons during World War II. In the film, another Marine sergeant is assigned to protect a Navajo code talker. In Arizona, we’re familiar with the Navajo nation. Because their language is complicated and was totally foreign to the Japanese, Navajos were recruited to transmit and interpret military messages. The Japanese were never able to break this code. The Navajo “Windtalkers” had a vital role in winning World War II!  

What is the purpose of a code?—to conceal and reveal; to communicate with your friends but confuse any enemies who might intercept the message. 

In a way, what the Marine sergeant and the Navajo code talkers did was what John was seeking to do. He wanted to convey a message of hope and encouragement to his fellow Christians who were suffering horribly under the Romans. But how could he do that in a way that his own people could understand but not their enemies? The answer—their own kind of code—apocalyptic! Apocalyptic language and literature, which John and his people knew very well, became their Spanish, their Navajo! Christians could read it and find great comfort and a powerful message in it. But any Roman coming across it would most likely ignore it as simply religious gibberish. John had some very harsh things to say about the Romans, especially the emperor, and it would not have been good for him or his fellow sufferers to have their enemies know what he was actually saying. So, the Book of Revelation can be seen as a code.  

We need to remember as we read and try to understand Revelation that John does not intend these images and numbers to be taken literally. Each one has a meaning for him and his readers. So to take everything he writes literally is to be utterly confused and misunderstand his message, which is exactly what he wanted when it came to their enemies. 

John realizes that some of his readers might be confused by what he says. So, a few times in this book he actually tells them what certain parts of the code mean. For example, in the very first chapter of Revelation John, in code, mentions several times the “seven stars” and the “seven golden candlesticks or lampstands.” In the very last verse of that chapter, verse 20, he writes this: 

As for the mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand, and the seven golden lampstands: the seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches. 

Now we can know whenever John refers to “seven golden lampstands” he is talking about the church, God’s people. In fact, in chapters 2-3, we read his letters to seven churches in Asia Minor. Referring to them as “golden lampstands” is saying that they were precious, valued to him and especially to God, even of more worth than gold. Referring to them as “lampstands” brings to mind the words of Jesus about his followers letting their light shine so the whole world can see it. John also is using a very old Jewish image here – the  menorah, a lampstand that has seven candles on it that is still used today in Jewish temples and synagogues, as it stands for the people themselves. In other words, “lampstand” is a code or symbol for God’s people and their mission in the world – to be light bearers! 

But what of these “seven stars” who we are told mean “the angels of the seven churches”? That’s part of the code we really have to work at and still can’t be fully confident that we understand. I believe John is referring to the leaders of the church—pastors, teachers, elders. And by saying “seven,” a number that always means for John “complete” or “whole,” He isn’t talking to seven individuals but to all leaders in all churches. John realizes that they provide a key for the survival and well-being of the church. They are the ones upon whom he has to depend to share the message of keep up the hopes and faith of their people in such desperate times. As the leaders go, so usually would the churches! 

Let’s look at another example—verses 12 and following. John has a vision of a wondrous being. This person wears a dazzling white robe with a gold sash. His hair is brilliant white also. His eyes are piercing like fire. His feet are like polished bronze, that is, powerful, strong. His words were more powerful than the ocean or the sharpest two-edged sword. He walks among the seven golden lampstands and holds the seven stars in his right hand – the hand of power. And he is called, “The Son of Man.” This is the one who was dead and yet is alive, who holds the keys to death and eternal life. John is so taken by this vision that he falls to his feet and is told, “Do not be afraid.” 

This is a vision of the risen, glorified Lord, Jesus, in his entire splendor. John wants them to see this Jesus, too. He wants to remind them of just who they are serving, and to hear and believe, “Do not be afraid.”  

Throughout this book, John is contrasting Christ with the Roman emperor, who must surely have been an imposing figure in all his royal regalia. I mean, Caesar was the ruler of the known world! His word carried life or death. He had massive armies at his disposal. How in the world could tiny little Christians ever stand a chance against the greatest power on earth?  John is telling them that Caesar, for all his glory and power, pales in comparison to the One who is truly the ruler of all, the One who has even conquered death. 

This One walks among the “seven golden lampstands,” that is, as we just discovered, means the churches! This majestic One isn’t up there somewhere, has not abandoned them but is right there among them. And the seven stars, which John says are the seven angels, which likely means the pastors and leaders of the church, are held in the right hand of this mighty One!  

John wants his readers to focus on this great truth – that they are ultimately in the hands of the risen, glorious Lord, no matter how it might seem otherwise. John wanted them to call to mind this great vision of Christ when they were being tested and tempted. Though it cost them dearly to do so, they were to continue to place their lives and their faith in this One, the One of whom even the Roman emperor would sooner or later how to bow before, the One who is truly the King of kings, and Lord of Lords! Remember this when great armies of adversity march seemingly march against you! Remember this when circumstances beyond your control would overwhelm you—don’t be afraid! For the majestic Son of Man walks among you and is by your side every step of your journey.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

How I Feel Today . . .


My thoughts, exactly!

Revelations on Revelation: Part 3


A couple of weeks ago I began a series entitled, “Revelations on Revelation.” What I am attempting to do is help give you some insights into probably the most misunderstood book in the Bible—the Book of Revelation.

      Recall in my first post that we explored the following: First, I emphasized the importance of reading the book itself and suggested Metzger’s book to read along with the text itself. I hope you’re doing this because it is vital for understanding it. Second, I shared with you the fact that not even the most learned scholars can rightly say they have all of Revelation figured out. So don’t be surprised when you run into things that puzzle you. Third, we explored how John is writing in a literary style of his day—apocalyptic. So the important thing to remember when reading this book is that you can’t take it literally. If we do, we’ll completely miss what he is trying to say.  

In the second post I shared the importance of trying to go back into John’s time and reading this through his and his reader’s eyes. Only if we do this can we begin to understand what he was saying then and what it means now. If we don’t do this, we run the very great risk of making his words mean something he never intended.  

In this post, I want to share what I’ve learned about what was going on in John’s world. Once we have a better understanding of that, we will not only begin to better understand what John wrote but also why he wrote the way he did. Then we can also gain some insights into what this means for us. 

 Imagine, if you can, that you’re living in a country that has one supreme, all-powerful ruler whose word means life or death. To enforce his word and will, he has a virtually undefeatable army. In fact, he is no longer treated like a mere mortal but is considered divine. So, all his subjects must take an oath swearing political and religious allegiance to him. If you don’t, you can’t obtain a license to do business. Everything you own can be confiscated. Your whole family can be arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and executed. You can be sent to a government work camp where you’ll die from extreme manual labor. Worship the supreme ruler or face the consequences—it’s your choice.  

You don’t need to use a lot of imagination to get some idea of what this must have been like. Such conditions have existed throughout human history and still do to this day! For the eleventh year running, North Korea (much in the news lately) is the most difficult place on earth to be a Christian. One of the remaining totalitarian Communist states, it is vehemently opposed to any religion except the state religion. Christians face arrest, detention, torture, even public execution. There is a system of labor camps including the renowned prison No. 15, which alone reportedly houses 6,000 persecuted Christians.  

The second most difficult place to be a Christian is our so-called “ally” in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia. There is no provision whatever for religious freedom in the constitution of this highly repressive Islamic kingdom. Public Christian worship is forbidden; worshipers risk imprisonment, lashing, deportation and torture. Sharing the gospel with Muslims and distributing non-Islamic materials is against the law. Muslims who convert to Christianity risk being murdered and foreign Christian workers have been exposed to abuse from employers.  

Number three on the list is Afghanistan, where our troops are still fighting to preserve the current regime, which our government calls “democratic.” Here, persecution by the government has pushed the church underground. The state treats converts (who all come from a Muslim background) in a very hostile manner. Christians can’t meet in public; even gatherings in private homes require extreme caution. No church buildings exist and both local and foreign Christians are subject to kidnapping, abduction, killing and having to flee the country. The Taliban is regaining power and has vowed to purge all Christians from Afghanistan, both foreign and local. 

Persecution like this was the historical context for John and his readers. This was especially so during the reign of Emperor Domitian (A.D. 81-96). (Most scholars believe that the Book of Revelation was written during his reign, probably about A.D. 95.)  

One of the things Domitian did more than any of his predecessors was to revive the Imperial cult. In other words, he declared himself and his family divine, referring to his couch as the “bed of a god.” Part of what this involved was forcing everyone to make sacrifices and burn incense to a statute of the emperor and say, “Caesar is Lord!” Shrines set up for this were established throughout the empire. For example, one of the seven letters to the churches in Revelation is to Ephesus, where we know there was a temple for emperor worship. Obviously, this is something that a Christian couldn’t in good faith do. The very first creed for Christians was simply this, “Jesus is Lord!” Indeed, one of the ways the Romans rooted out Christians was to force them to bow before the emperor and say, “Caesar is Lord!” Those who refused to do this they knew to be Christians. 

For some time Christians had been protected. The Roman authorities had simply seen them as part of Judaism and Jews, for the most part, had been given an exemption from emperor worship. It is fair to say that Rome had never met anyone like the Jews before—that is, such ardent monotheists. Monotheism (belief in one God) was unusual in those days. The only way to have complete compliance to the worship of Caesar would have been to kill all Jews. But the Romans realized this would be a huge waste of resources for them, so as long as Christians were seen as essentially Jewish, they also enjoyed that exemption. But Rome began to discover that these Christians weren’t Jews at all, so the exemption was taken away. 

The practice of worshipping the emperor was as much political as religious. It was a way of trying to impose loyalty over a diverse population, bringing some uniformity or order to the whole empire. Those who refused couldn’t do business, all their property could be taken and they could be imprisoned and executed. Some would be sent into exile to work as slaves. In fact, this is the case with John, the writer of Revelation. One of the first things he writes in this book is this: 

I, John, your brother who shares with you in the hardship, kingdom, and endurance that we have in Jesus, was on the island called Patmos because of the word of God and my witness about Jesus. (Revelation 1:9). 

In other words John, because he hadn’t bowed down to the emperor, has been exiled to a Roman “concentration camp” on the Island of Patmos! His prison isn’t made of stone but water—the sea. In fact, as you read Revelation, notice how often John refers to the sea in one way or another. John was suffering for his faith. He knew firsthand what his fellow Christians were having to endure, which is probably why he shares with them so early in his book his own circumstances. He is one of them! He understands! As one of them his words carry great weight and authority. He was also known by them, respected, even more so now because of his example of suffering. John isn’t merely telling them to do as he says but as he himself is doing! 

Basically, Christianity had been outlawed. It was an illegal religion.  Christians had to meet in secret, sometimes in sewers and catacombs. Meeting in such places made the Romans even more suspicious of them. Hearing rumors that Christians even drank blood and ate flesh, did not help improve their reputation with Romans. Why would they have thought Christians did such things? Right—Holy Communion, the “body” and “blood” of Christ. Christians had to hide their sacred writings. They lived in constant fear of being brought before the authorities, of being forced to make a choice—Caesar or Jesus?  

Some forsook their faith. Some worshipped the emperor but with their fingers crossed behind their backs, i.e., not really meaning it. But others, like John, refused and suffered the consequences. John, in some ways, was fortunate. He was only exiled. In Revelation 20:4 we read this: 

Then I saw thrones, and people took their seats on them, and judgment was given in their favor. They were the ones who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and God’s word, and those who hadn’t worshipped the beast or its image, who hadn’t received the mark on their forehead or hand. They came to life and ruled with Christ for one thousand years. 

Already some Christians had paid the full price for their faith—they had been beheaded. Beheading, along with crucifixion, were favorite forms of execution by the Romans. Roman citizens were beheaded; non-citizens were usually crucified. 

John’s message is one of encouragement.  “Remain faithful, no matter what! Don’t give in to the worship of Caesar as Lord. Only Jesus is Lord! Don’t compromise your faith, even if it costs you dearly. The emperor and the Roman Empire, contrary to how it may appear, are not all-powerful. Rome will be judged sternly. All it has imposed on others it will receive back in kind and worse. Those who remain faithful to the end will share in Christ’s ultimate victory and be given a crown of eternal life. So stay faithful, no matter what!” 

John has held himself up as an example of this. He is in exile because of his faith. But notice that even before he says this about himself he says this in the first chapter of Revelation:  

Grace and peace to you from the one who is and was and is coming, and from the seven spirits that are before God’s throne, and from Jesus Christ—the faithful witness, the firstborn from among the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth (vv. 4-5).

John refers to Jesus as “the faithful witness.” The Greek word for “witness” is the one from which we get the English word “martyr.” In other words, John is holding up Jesus as the supreme example for them. Jesus faced Roman persecution, was tortured, was crucified but remained faithful to the end! They could too! And that was not the end for Jesus. He was the “firstborn of the dead”—a reference to resurrection. He arose! He is “ruler of the kings of the earth”—even and especially Caesar! He sits at the right hand of God and will come at God’s appointed time to bring an end to this persecution and establish, as we see in the last two chapters of Revelation, a new heaven and a new earth! They, too, will share in all of this and more. So, be faithful to the end, even if it costs you your life. Your life is ultimately in the hands of a risen Lord!

Monday, April 15, 2013

Revelations on Revelation - Part 2

Last week I began a series on one of the most confusing and misunderstood books in the Bible—the Book of Revelation. My hope is to throw some light on this much disputed and often mysterious last book in the Bible.

The next “revelation” I would share with you on the Book of Revelation has to do with the vital importance of asking the right questions in the right order.
       If there ever was a book of the Bible that raised questions, it’s the Book of Revelation. In fact, it has spawned so many questions and confusion that, as I shared, some have thought it best just to ignore it. I can imagine that if you have lots of questions already. That’s a good thing. Asking questions is the right step to better understanding it. However, we need to begin with the right question. That question is simply this:

“What DID it mean?”
       In other words, what was John trying to say to his people in his time? How did they understand it? What was the historical, political, religious context in which he wrote? What was going on with John and his first readers? Unless we first ask and seek to answer, “What did it mean?” we cannot rightly and accurately go on to ask, “What does it mean for us today?”

When we fail to ask, “What did it mean?” we risk making it mean whatever we want; we are very likely to misuse and abuse it, making it say or mean something it was never intended to mean. This is quite true of the whole Bible for that matter—that if we ignore its original context and setting, you can make the Bible support just about anything you want. So it is that the Bible has been used, for example, to justify the persecution of Jews and other people over the centuries. It was used to support slavery. Some still use it to exclude women from leadership in the church or to keep lesbian and gay people from fully participating in the life of the church. Rather than looking at the contexts of these passages and the whole message of the Bible, persons come to it seeking to find support for views they already hold, not to discover what it really has to say.
To get a little more technical, the word for finding out what the Bible really says is “exegesis.” It means to “bring out” the meaning of a biblical text. In other words, to discover what it meant. The opposite of this is “eisegesis,” which means reading a meaning “into” the text.
I remember a cartoon that had a little boy lying on the floor flipping like crazy through the Bible. His sister walked up to him and he said to her, “Don’t bother me! I’m looking for verses to back up my preconceived notions!”
Who hasn’t been guilty of that, of doing more eisegesis than exegesis?
One of the major concerns I have about many of the popular books about Revelation is that they pretty much ignore the first and most crucial question. They rush right onto, “What does it mean?” without having first asked and answered, “What did it mean?” Why? Because they already have a lot of “preconceived notions” about what it should mean and are very creative in finding passages that they can cut and paste and twist to support their views.
Most of their views or understandings of Revelation can be traced back to an Irish clergyman named John Nelson Darby. Darby lived in the 1800’s during times of great political, social and economic change and turmoil. It must have seemed like apocalyptic times to him. Many began to believe that the end was near. Darby began a whole system or understanding of the Bible based on his belief the end was near. He saw the Bible as basically prewritten history, that is, a record not so much of what happened but what was to happen. Many of the most popular ideas being written and preached about today, like the rapture and the great tribulation, go back to him. He began to spread his ideas in the late 1820s, going everywhere he could, preaching and teaching his beliefs. Many Bible students and pastors were attracted to his views, which became known as “dispensationalism.” One of them was a lawyer named Cyrus I. Scofield, who was so inspired by what he saw that he had an idea—a Bible with notes. This is simply the King James Version with C. I. Scofield’s notes, based on the ideas and theories of Darby. This came to be called the “Schofield Bible,” and it had a huge impact all across America.
My concern about this approach is that it doesn’t begin with Revelation itself but with ideas, theories, and preconceived notions that are imposed on Revelation. All too often, the result is the blatant distortion and abuse of scripture, using it to support views and political agendas that are the very opposite of what the Bible actually teaches.
One book about Revelation I ran into on Amazon.com is Can America Survive? Updated Edition: Startling Revelations and Promises of Hope, written by one of my least favorite TV preachers, John Hagee. Here are some selected comments from Amazon’s blurb for the book:
. . . the seeds for tragedy. . . evidenced by the disturbing economic, geopolitical, and religious trends that now threaten to dismantle the very nation itself. . . . recent events . . . that could bring down the “unsinkable” United States of America including:
. . .  history’s evidence of the danger to any nation that challenges Israel’s God-mandated right to exist
The dangerous belittling of Iran’s nuclear threat . . . the super-weapon that could stop the U.S. in its tracks instantly
. . . Iran as one of six countries that will form an Islamic military force “as a cloud to cover the land”
The . . . national economic trends that are poised to bring about the death of the American dollar
The criminalization of Christianity around the world . . .
And so forth.
Books like Hagee’s are a total abuse of the Bible and a cynical manipulation of the very real concerns and fears of many. (No doubt, in spite of the economic disaster Hagee predicts, his own financial situation will improve considerably as fearful, worried and gullible people buy his book!)
Here’s the point. The writer of Revelation isn’t here to defend himself. He can’t say, “Hold on there! That’s not even close to what I was saying!” So, we must go to some lengths to put on first-century glasses, to try and understand what John was saying in his own historical context. In other words, we must first ask and answer, “What did it mean?” setting aside as much as we can all our preconceived notions about what we think or want it to mean.
James Efird, a professor at Duke University, often used a wonderful illustration about how important it is to understand the original context and setting for biblical writings. He held up an editorial cartoon from a newspaper. (Keep it in mind that the year was 1976.) The cartoon had a large, grinning peanut on it with lots of teeth standing on top of the world. Professor Efird asked, “What if in 200 years from now, someone found this and declared, ‘Oh no! Peanuts are going to come alive, unite and take over the world!’ Would that be an accurate interpretation?”
Actually, this cartoon was referring to the fact that in 1976 a peanut farmer named Jimmy Carter was elected as President of the United States, the most powerful country in the world! Dr. Efird went on to make the point that too many people do the same thing with the Bible. They read something in it and then jump to conclusions about what it means before they ever ask, “What did it mean?” What was the original and full context?
I hope you’re beginning to understand this vital point for the Bible as well. Context is everything. What it really comes down to is this—truly respecting and valuing the Bible! It is far easier to misuse it, than doing the painstaking study necessary to understand what these writers were saying in their own time and setting. That takes work! It’s far easier and quicker to lay on the floor flipping through it looking for support for preconceived notions! It’s far better to try to come to it, not seeking to impose our views on it, but rather listening for its views, hearing its story and letting them inform, correct and challenge our own. Yes, it is far easier to read and preach and teach the Bible un-biblically than biblically!
Think about this in another way. If the writer of Revelation was just writing for those in the distant future, of what possible use was he or his book to the people of his own time? No where do I hear him saying, “Uh, sorry, fellow Christians. I know you need help and comfort and guidance right now, but I’m writing for TV preachers and bestselling authors 20 centuries from now!” The fact is that John had a powerful message for the people of his time, whom he loved dearly. Had it not been so, it is doubtful that this book would have been preserved at all. If we are to do right by the author and benefit from his message, we must not begin with, “What does it mean?” but, “What did it mean?”
Next week I’ll share with you more revelations about what Revelation meant. Keep reading it or start if you haven’t. Remember as you read that Revelation had a powerful, timely message for those Christians living under persecution by the Roman Empire in the first century—a message that we will also discover is relevant for us as well!